Well…. the Bible says that in the end days the world will be as it was in the times of Noah. Sin and perversion will run rampant and be embraced by mankind. One sin God calls an abomination in His sight is the sin of homosexuality. This biblical view point is not that of man, but it is still declared by the Holy Word of God. This biblical view is sadly denounced by the pro-homosexual front as prejudiced and intolerant; while, any opposition to their agenda is vociferously attacked as intolerant and hateful as well. Yet, their aggressive agenda towards the traditional family unit is hypocritically to be accepted without dispute or debate. While God calls homosexuality sin, the homosexual front calls it a sexual preference, life style choice or genetic disposition. It is human nature to try to justify or rationalize sin in our lives. This is America where every man is entitled to his opinion, even if that opinion goes against the grain of the popular views being espoused at the time, whether that being voiced by the majority or minority of the people. Yet, if possible, the pro-homosexual front would deny the voice of the godly man an opportunity to be heard. What has happened to this country, which was founded upon the foundation of Christian values and morals? It used to be that the godly man was respected and honored. The life and values of a godly man were something to be strived for, the obtaining thereof to be valued. Yet, the voice of dissension today is to mock, ridicule and deride the Christian life. The aggressive agenda of the pro-homosexual front in this country has basically declared war against the biblical family unit as promoted by God. The following is a sad example of this agenda and should be a wake up notice and cause for alarm to all that is Holy to the Lord God. We should love all men, but hate the sin’s perpetrated by man. In other words, “Love the sinner, but hate the sin.” This is not advocating hate or offensive action towards the homosexual, but is addressing the issue of homosexuality in this nation and throughout the world. The moral decline of this nation is like a giant snowball rolling down the snowy slopes, gaining speed and size each day. No nation in the history of mankind that has embraced homosexuality has been able to stand as the judgment of God has come upon that nation. The acceptance and even promotion of this issue by this nation is certainly a tremendous cause for concern.
The following was taken from Christian Online websites
The agenda of the current administration certainly seems to affirm God’s Word. Under President Obama’s administration, Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s has appointed Kevin Jennings, founder of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) — which sponsored the conference that produced the notorious “Fistgate” scandal (in which young teens were guided on how to perform dangerous homosexual perversions including “fisting”) — to head up the “Safe Schools” efforts at the Department of Education. Jennings is a vicious, anti-religious bigot who once said “[F–k] ‘em” to the “Religious Right.” He supports promoting homosexuality and gender confusion as normative to even young students.
Few Obama administration appointments have been as startling as Education Secretary Arne Duncan’s appointment of Kevin Jennings, the homosexual founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), to head the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. Jennings was undoubtedly chosen for this post (which does not require Senate confirmation) because the foundation of the homosexual education agenda is the concept of “safe schools.” However, “safe schools” as GLSEN defines them are like “hate crime laws” for kids. GLSEN’s model legislation would create protected categories like “sex, gender, . . . sexual orientation, [and] gender identity or expression.” (Ironically, they don’t include protection for the factor that GLSEN’s own research shows is the most common reason for harassment of students -- “the way they look or their body size.”) Everyone opposes violence, name-calling, and other forms of bullying. As with “hate crimes,” though, GLSEN’s “safe schools” do not protect everyone equally, but instead single out homosexuals for more protection than others.
Despite this inequity, some might be tempted to support the “safe schools” agenda as long as it is limited to ending bullying, and does not extend to actively affirming or promoting homosexuality. However, in a 1995 speech, Jennings admitted that the rhetoric about “safety” was a political device, saying that it “threw our opponents on the defensive, and stole their best line of attack. This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedaling.” In a 1997 speech he embraced the idea of actively “promoting” homosexuality, looking forward to a day when “people, when they would hear that someone was promoting homosexuality, would say, ‘Yeah, who cares?’” And an unsigned article on the GLSEN website in 2000 declared, “The pursuit of safety and affirmation are one and the same goal.”
While Jennings promotes tolerance toward homosexuals, he is unwilling to reciprocate by extending tolerance to those who disagree with him. His memoir, Mama’s Boy, Preacher’s Son, seethes with bitterness toward Southern Baptists, the country’s largest Protestant denomination (within which he was raised). Perhaps that’s why, in a speech in a New York church in 2000, Jennings is reported to have said, “We have to quit being afraid of the religious right. . . . I’m trying not to say, ‘[F---] ‘em!’ which is what I want to say, because I don’t care what they think! Drop dead!”
He wants homosexuality to be taught in American schools -- in his book Always My Child, Jennings calls for a “diversity policy that mandates including LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] themes in the curriculum.” But he wants only one side of this controversial issue to be aired, and apparently believes in locking sexually confused kids into a “gay” identity. That’s the implication of his declaration, “Ex-gay messages have no place in our nation’s public schools. A line has been drawn. There is no ‘other side’ when you’re talking about lesbian, gay and bisexual students.”
Jennings does not limit his promotion of homosexuality in schools only to high schools or middle schools. He wrote the foreword for a book titled Queering Elementary Education, which includes an essay declaring that “‘queerly raised’ children are agents” using “strategies of adaptation, negotiation, resistance, and subversion.”
Perhaps the most dramatic illustration, however, of Jennings’ unfitness for a “safe schools” post involves an incident when he taught at Concord Academy, a private boarding school in Massachusetts. In his book One Teacher in Ten (the title is based on the discredited myth, now abandoned even by “gay” activist groups, that ten percent of the population is homosexual), he tells about a young male sophomore, “Brewster,” who confessed to Jennings “his involvement with an older man he met in Boston.” But at a GLSEN rally in 2000, Jennings told a more explicit version of “Brewster’s” story. Jennings here quotes the boy and then comments: “‘I met someone in the bus station bathroom and I went home with him.’ High school sophomore, 15 years old. That was the only way he knew how to meet gay people.”
Did Jennings report this high-risk behavior to the authorities? To the school? To the boy’s parents? No -- he just told the boy, “I hope you knew to use a condom.” Sex between an adult and a young person below the “age of consent” (which varies from state to state) is a crime known as statutory rape, and some states mandate that people in certain professions report such abuse.
I do not know if “Brewster” was below the age of consent, nor whether Jennings was a mandatory reporter or violated mandatory reporting laws. When members of the National Education Association protested an NEA award to Jennings because of this incident, Jennings called the criticism “potentially libelous” and a GLSEN lawyer demanded a retraction. But when officials at Concord Academy -- the school where Jennings had taught -- were asked about the scenario described in one of Jennings’ accounts, a school spokesman said that such an incident should be reported.
In any case, public service requires adherence to a higher ethical standard than bare compliance with the law. Instead of veiled threats, Jennings now owes the public a thorough explanation of the “Brewster” incident. Regardless of the law, a 15-year-old who meets sexual partners in a bus station restroom requires more than a condom to be “safe.”
Kevin Jennings has neither the temperament nor the ethical standards needed for public service. His history suggests a commitment to serving his own desires and one narrow part of the student population. He is unfit for the post to which he’s been assigned, and Secretary Duncan should withdraw his appointment at once.
Summary: It is written in the Bible that God warned the Israelites seven different times that He was bringing those from heathen nations against the Israel nation for their evil deeds. God has given at least three men visions warning us that those from heathen nations will come up against America for the evil that she has done and America will be destroyed. Read RFC Newsletter #101 posted in my Blog Archive found in the month of February.
But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— having a form of godliness but denying its power…… (II Tim. 3:1-5)
In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, while evil men and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. (II Tim. 3:12-13)